网站地图 北京大学 友情链接
您的当前位置:首页 >> 内容详细页
中国公众参与观察
中国公众参与观察2015年2月合刊
阅读:2109次    发布时间:2015-3-3
 


 
 

2015年第2期(2月1日-2月28日) 总第88期

2015年3月2日 星期一

要闻 Headline

 

立法动态

法律不应为烟草广告留空间
Law shall not tolerate tobacco advertisement

境外非政府组织管理法草案上会审议
Draft of Foreign Non-Government Organization Administration Law is under review

联防联控:大气污染防治“新常态”
New method to control air pollution

反恐法草案新增内容:法院可直接认定恐怖组织和人员
New addition to Anti-Terrorists Law: Court can determine terrorists and terrorist organization

中国修法拟重奖科研人员促进成果转化
China amends regulations to “aggressively” reward researchers aiming to promote the commercialization of technology findings

2015年中国立法前瞻
Forecast of legislation in 2015


行政法治


公务员职级晋升条件出炉:正科满15年享副处待遇
Promotion conditions for civil servant are released

聚焦“重典治污”:环保部门第一次有行政强制权
Environmental protection authority is empowered with administrative coercive power for the first time

中国将提高政府采购透明度 加大处罚问责力度
 China aims to promote the transparency of government purchase


"账号十条"3月1日正式施行 各网站自查违规账号6万
New policy released regulates website accounts

教育部就高招发26条禁令 人口大省录取率将提高
Ministry of Education publishes 26 new prohibitions regarding to university enrollment

“中国烟草”招牌首次被处罚 专家建议全面禁止烟草广告、促销和赞助
Tobacco advertisement was punished in China for the first time

李克强斥繁琐审批:上面多头多脑 下面“昏头昏脑”
Premier Li criticizes the complicated process of administrative approval and examination



司法观察

 

尹相杰因非法持有毒品罪被判有期徒刑7个月
Chinese singer Xiangjie Yin was sentenced to 7 months for illegal holding of drugs

赵志红提出上诉 一审被认定为“呼格案”真凶
Zhihong Zhao appeals to the higher court


最高法第一巡回法庭将开审首案:跨省买卖合同纠纷
First Circuit Court of SPC is going to hear its first case

司法判决首次对行政垄断说不 广东教育厅被判违法
Court say “no” to administrative monopoly: Guangdong education authority was decided to have violated the law

最高法发布关于全面深化人民法院改革的意见
SPC published its decision on further reforms of court

最高人民法院发布修订后人民法院“四五改革纲要”
SPC published its revised synopsis of reform

最高法:将建立领导干预司法等信息入卷存查机制
SPC: intervention from administration to judicial process will be recorded

最高检《关于全面推进检务公开工作的意见》
SPP issued its comments on promoting transparency of procuratorate


评论精华

 

法院改革的两组关键词
Two groups of key words in judicial reform

“看得见的政府”呈现看得见的正义
“Visible government” will present visible justice

呼唤阳光信访,更呼唤信法不信访
Legal procedure is better than petition

谨防民主测评的负效应
Be careful with the negative effects of democratic appraisal

法治护航“三块地”改革
Ruling by law will secure the reforms

实现良法之治:中国立法助推改革
Good law governs: Legislation benefits reforms

 

典型案例

 

原21世纪报系多名高管被移送审查起诉
Several former senior managers of 21 century media were sued
 

两名离校高中生9天杀害7人 主犯被执行死刑
Two high school students murder 7 victims in 9 days

河北地摊摆卖邮件续:卖货人称系在集市上所买
Seller of missing mail says the mails were purchased in street market

检方决定不起诉“抗癌药代购第一人”:不构成犯罪
 The procuratorate decides not to sue the first “purchasing agent” of anti-cancer medicine

“京城第一贪”儿子为捞父亲出狱 被骗328万元
The son of corrupted officials was deceived for 3.28 million in his attempt to save his father

湖北最大污染环境入刑案一审宣判 14人领刑并受罚
The biggest pollution case in Hubei reaches its first trial decision in the criminal case


 

 

要闻聚焦:关注政府采购法实施条例

媒体评论:(Comments From Media)

 

我国政府采购法实施条例发布 下月起施行

Enforcement regulation of Government Purchase Law is published now

 

授权发布:中华人民共和国政府采购法实施条例
Enforcement regulation of Government Purchase Law

 

政府采购法3月1日实施 遏制“豪华采购”
 New regulation of government expenses will cut down “luxury purchase”

 

本刊评论综述

 

政府采购被称为“阳光下的交易”。然而近几年,因为频频爆出的“天价采购”“黑心采购”等问题,成为社会关注的热点。其问题的背后,与政府采购法实施12年而与之配套的实施条例缺失有关。 2015年2月27日,国务院正式公布政府采购法实施条例。条例将于3月1日实施。各界期望,以条例为契机,从制度上推进政府采购的规范化、法治化进程,堵住寻租腐败的黑洞,让政府采购真正回归阳光、公平、公正。

 

从内容上来看,政府采购法实施条例有以下几个重大改进:第一,新增采购需求管理。即明确了采购需求的内容,如规定采购人应当科学合理确定采购需求,明确采购需求成为政府采购的重要目标和依据,并规定采购标准应当依据经费预算标准、资产配置标准和技术、服务标准确定等。第二,采购过程阳光透明。针对“暗箱操作”,条例规定,项目信息必须公开;政府采购项目信息应当在指定媒体上发布;采购项目预算金额应当在采购文件中公开;中标的单一供应商名称必须在指定媒体上公示。此外,采购文件、中标、成交结果、采购合同也必须公开。投诉处理结果也必须公开。第三,规范专家评定行为。为保证评审专家公平、公正评审,条例对政府采购评审专家的入库、抽取、评审、处罚、退出等环节作了全面规定,旨在确保专家“随机”产生,防止评审专家终身固定。

 

用法治规范政府行为,用法律完善社会秩序。政府采购法实施条例的颁布,是推进阳光政府建设的又一重要举措。   

February 27, the State Council officially published the implementing regulation of Government Purchase Law. The regulations will be implemented on March 1. The public expects the regulation to be an opportunity to promote the standardization and the transparency of government purchase.

There are several major improvements in this implementing regulation. First, a new system of requirements management in government purchase is newly introduced. For instance, the more details are included into the planning of purchase. Second, the whole process of bidding and purchasing is required to be transparent supported by specific channels including disclosure on required media. Third, more rules are made on the expert assessment process and the experts will be put under more supervision.

 

视 点

View Point

 

一人入狱,众人唏嘘——明星的另一种锋芒
 

媒体评论:(Comments From Media)

 

歌手尹相杰自愿认罪:为减压 从2003年开始吸毒

Singer Xiangjie Yin: drug using begins from 2003

 

尹相杰吸毒被抓
Xiangjie Yin was detained for drug using

 

尹相杰涉毒案开庭 明星吸毒风云几时休
The case of Xiangjie Yin is to be heard

 

涉毒纷纷落网 从心理生理层面看明星吸毒
Multiple explanations for the drug use of “super star”

 

本刊评论综述

    

2015年2月28日,歌手尹相杰涉嫌非法持有毒品案在北京市朝阳区人民法院依法公开开庭审理。尹相杰去年12月被北京警方查获,现场起获包括冰毒等种类的毒品近15克。公诉机关认为,被告人尹相杰无视国法,非法持有毒品,其行为触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百四十八条之规定,犯罪事实清楚,证据确实、充分,应当以非法持有毒品罪追究其刑事责任。一审当庭宣判罪名成立,判处7个月有期徒刑、罚金2000元。

 

继满文军、孙兴、谢东、沙宝亮、苏永康、景岗山、陈百强之后,在2014年,吸毒丑闻频频爆出,李代沫、张元、宁财神、张默、高虎、柯震东、房祖名纷纷入网,每每报道某个明星因吸毒入狱,就会在各种媒体上喧闹几日,明星的光环暗淡,明星的前途折断。入狱的明星大多数是因为吸毒,有些是寻求刺激,有些是身体需要,有些是社交需要,有些是抵抗压力。不同的理由却做出同一个选择,这不得不使得大众联想,明星是否就是潜在的吸毒者?文艺圈是否就是吸毒高发区?在公众的众说纷纭与浮想联翩中,对于毒品的恐惧潜移默化的影响着下一代的心理。

 

明星吸毒的影响不仅停留在社会层面上,更是法律层面的改变。随着公众法律意识的提升,明星吸毒的焦点慢慢的由谁吸毒转变为定罪量刑的公正性。每次审判的结果都会引发公众对于量刑轻重的讨论,从另一个层面来讲,这是大众觉悟的进步与提升,人们不仅仅感性的感慨,而是理智的审视,而建设法治国家,需要的就是理性的公民与理性的媒体。   

On February 28 the case of singer Xiangjie Yin processing drugs held a public hearing in Beijing Chaoyang District People’s Court. Last December, police seized Xiangjie Yin with drugs, including methamphetamine of nearly 15 grams. Public prosecutor says that the defendant Xiangjie Yin ignores the state laws with his illegal possession of drugs, which violated the Article 148 of Criminal Law.

Recently, many celebrities were caught abusing drugs. Some of the abuses are results of stimulation seeking, while others may come from so-called “social needs”. No matter which specific reason it is behind those using, it is clear that the increasing emergence and revealing of celebrities using drugs may divert the attention of the public from “who is using drugs” to “how to regulate the illegal drug abuse”. From certain aspects, this promotes the social awareness of rationality and rule by law.

 

公告

敬爱的读者:                                                                         
       

        本刊已被北大法宝法学期刊数据库收录,即日起读者可登陆北大法律信息网阅览本刊内容及过往期次。谢谢!
                

                                                                               本刊编辑部 

 
 

编辑团队

北京大学公众参与研究与支持中心
主任:王锡锌(北京大学法学院副院长、教授);副主任:李媛媛(北京大学法学博士)
本刊编辑:谢宇(北京大学法学院2013级硕士) 卓昊洋(北京大学法学院2013级硕士)
 

 

 
网站介绍网站地图版权与免责联系我们
版权所有©北京大学公众参与研究与支持中心    技术支持:北京互联信通网站建设   京ICP备09041777号 京公网安备11010802008500号
DHL快递电话 北京DHL 白癜风 指纹考勤机 北京seo 食堂售饭机 北京建站 dhl快递电话 白癜风遮盖液 白癜风遮盖液 白癜风遮盖液 小额贷款 北京企业邮箱 北京高空作业车